IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Navneet Kumar, J.
Baldeo Manjhi and ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 565 & 865 of 2004
Decided On : 05-01-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 148, 307/149, 326/149, 379/149 - Rioting, armed with deadly weapon – Attempt to Murder – Appeal against conviction - Informant alleged that while he was returning along with his son and his co-villager after selling readymade cloths and sarees from market - When he reached near small bushes then all of a sudden 6-7 persons came out from behind Banyan tree and Guleshwar had given a lathi blow on left thumb of his hand as a result of which his cycle fell down - Thereafter, he saw that Rohin armed with Chhura, Ghena armed with Chhura, Rijhu armed with lathi, Niranjan Ghansi armed with lathi and Baldeo Manjhi armed with Farsa surrounded him and they started assaulting him with their respective weapons in their hands. The aforesaid accused persons had also assaulted his son from their lathi - All accused persons had taken the cloths, cash and H.M.T. wrist watch “Kohinoor” from possession of informant and the aforesaid accused persons had also taken away the readymade cloths, Sarees, Gamchha, Bed-sheets, blouse etc. from Prafull Bhagat and they had also taken Rs. 500/- in cash and H.M.T. wrist watch from Prafull Bhagat and aforesaid accused persons fled away on bicycles of the informant – Held, Appellants are sentenced to imprisonment for the period already undergone and further sentence of composite fine under all the counts collectively by way of compensation in order to pay a sum of Rs. 1000/- by each of the appellants to both the injured P.W. 10 and P.W. 1 separately, failing which the appellants shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months - There is nothing on record about their criminal history. It has also been pointed out that the appellants at the time of facing trial at their middle age and some of them other appellants were about 50 years old and, therefore, in this view of the matter a lenient view may be taken - learned trial court is directed to ensure amount of fine, if so deposited, is disbursed to victim P.W. 1 and P.W. 10 by issuing proper notices to them. Further, the learned concerned court is also directed that if any one of victims, namely, P.W. 1 or P.W. 10 (informant) is not found available for whatsoever reason may be, then fine amount so deposited by the appellants shall be disbursed to their close/near relatives/kith & kin as deem fit and proper - Appeal dismissed.
ORDER :
Both the appeals have been preferred by the five appellants, namely, Baldeo Manjhi, Rohin Manjhi, Dhena Manjhi of Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 565 of 2004 and Rijhu Manjhi and Niranjan Ghashi of Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 865 of 2004 against the common judgment of conviction dated 19.03.2004 and order of sentence dated 20.03.2004 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions judge, Bermo at Tenughat, in S.T. No. 333 of 1994/24 of 2003, whereby and where under the learned court below has found guilty and convicted the appellants Baldeo Manjhi, Rohin Manjhi, Ghena (Dhena) Manjhi of Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 565 of 2004 u/s 148, 307/149, 326/149, 379/149 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced the appellants to undergo R.I. for two years for the offence u/s 148 of IPC and five years RI for the offence u/s 307/149 of IPC and three years R.I. for the offence under sections 326/149 of IPC and two years R.I. for the offence u/s 379/149 of IPC and all the sentences are directed to run concurrently and the appellants Rijhu Manjhi and Niranjan Ghashi of Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 865 of 2004 are held guilty and convicted u/s 147, 307/149, 323/149, 379/149 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo S.I. for one year for the offence u/s 147 of IPC and 323/149 of IPC and five years S.I. for the offence u/s 307/149 of IPC and two year S.I. for the offence u/s 379/149 of IPC and all the sentences are directed to run concurrently.
2. Briefly stating the prosecution story as unfolded in the fardbeyan by informant Ashok Bhagat recorded by the ASI K.P. Singh of Jaridih Police Station in the district of Bokaro (Jharkhand) on 06.11.1993 on 21.30 hours at referral Hospital Jainamore ward is as under :
The informant alleged that while he was returning along with his son Santosh Kumar Jaiswal and his co-villager Prafull Bhagat after selling readymade cloths and sarees from the market then at about 6.00 p.m. when he reached near the small bushes then all of a sudden 6-7 persons came out from behind the Banyan tree and Guleshwar Manjhi had given a lathi blow on the left thumb of his hand as a result of which his cycle fell down. Thereafter, he saw that Rohin Manjhi armed with Chhura, Ghena Manjhi armed with Chhura, Rijhu Majhi armed with lathi, Niranjan Ghansi armed with lathi and Baldeo Manjhi armed with Farsa surrounded him and they started assaulting him with their respective weapons in their hands. The aforesaid accused persons had also assaulted his son Santosh Kumar and Prafull Bhagat from their lathi. It is further alleged that all the accused persons had taken the cloths, cash of Rs. 800/- and H.M.T. wrist watch “Kohinoor” from the possession of the informant Ashok Bhagat and the aforesaid accused persons had also taken away the readymade cloths, Sarees, Gamchha, Bed-sheets, blouse etc. from Prafull Bhagat and they had also taken Rs. 500/- in cash and H.M.T. wrist watch from Prafull Bhagat and the aforesaid accused persons fled away on the bicycles of the informant Ashok Bhagat, Prafull Bhagat and Santosh Kumar Jaiswal. The alleged occurrence is said to have committed because of land dispute.
The aforesaid injures were brought at Referal Hospital Jainamore, where the aforesaid fardbeyan of the informant Ashok Bhagat was recorded by A.S.I., K.P. Singh of Jaridih, P.S. On which the police has registered the case as Jaridih P.S. Case No. 90/93 and the Police after completing the investigation, submitted charge sheet against the accused persons on which the learned A.C.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat took cognizance of the case and transferred it to the court of S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat for commitment, who on 21.09.1994 committed this case to the Court of Sessions.
3. Having received the record of complaint, the learned trial court framed the charge against the accused appellants for the offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 307/149, 325/149, 326/149, 379/149 of IPC. After conclusion of the trial, the learned trial court passed the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.