SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 576

RAJESH SHANKAR
Manti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mrs. Aanya.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh.

ORDER :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing order dated 12.01.2021 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no. 2 the Deputy Commissioner, Chatra in PDS Shop Appeal No. 16/2016 as well as for setting aside the order dated 26.05.2016 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no. 3 the Sub-Divisional Officer, Chatra by which the petitioner’s PDS licence has been cancelled and subsequently in appeal preferred before the respondent no. 2, the said order has been confirmed.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of preferring second appeal before the Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh under Rule 30(i) of Jharkhand Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2019, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage.

3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable at this stage. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse against the impugned orders as provided under law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top