SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 574

RAJESH SHANKAR
Bhagirath Saw – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Anish Kumar Mishra, Adv

JUDGMENT :

The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- (rupees eight lakhs) deducted from the final bill of the petitioner under the head of “royalty towards earth work” which, according to him, is beyond the terms of the agreement.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents referring to clause 3.3 of Section-III Part-2 of the special conditions for F2 contract which provides as under:

    “If the Royalty clearance certificate for mines/minerals used in the work is not produced with the bill, Royalty will be deducted from the concerned running bill, as per instruction of the Department of Mines. Production of royalty clearance certificate along with the final bill is a must, failing which final bill will neither be passed nor paid, and for such non-payment or delay in payment, the whole and sole responsibility will be of contractor alone.”

3. It has also been stated in the counter affidavit that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition has attained finality in terms with the judgment dated 28.06.2016 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 705 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top