SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 28

RAJESH SHANKAR
Madhuri Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Sinha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manav Poddar.

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SHANKAR, J.

1. The case is taken up through Video Conferencing.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the District Administration, Ranchi to take appropriate steps for restraining the heirs of Late Sukra Pahan and Late Bhikha Pahan from forcibly grabbing the petitioner’s land appertaining to Khata No. 316, R.S. Plot No. 964, Municipal Holding No. 8, Ward No. 29, measuring an area of 3 Katthas, which was purchased by her from one Badal Khan S/o Late Chedi Khansama by virtue of registered sale-deed No. 8841 dated 26.08.1985.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring to the order dated 20.08.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) No. 225/2003 [Ajay Kumar Sinha and Others vs. State of Jharkhand and Others] submits that this Court has decided the issue with regard to the land under the same Khata and Plot in favour of the purchasers and against the original Raiyats (Tribal)/their heirs by setting aside different orders passed by the Special Officer as well as appellate and revisional authorities and as such the heirs of Late Sukra Pahan and Late Bhikha Pahan should be restrained by the District Administration, Ranchi from for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top