S.N.PATHAK
Arbind Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the Notification contained in Memo No. 2229 dated 17.5.2017 (Annexure-6), whereby the petitioner has been awarded as many as five punishments, including stoppage of five increments with cumulative effect; not to be posted on higher post on in-charge basis; and not entitled for any payment other than subsistence allowance for the period of suspension. Petitioner has also prayed for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 3043 dated 22.8.2019, whereby review petition preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.
3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. While the petitioner was posted as Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Division, Chakradharpur, charge-sheet contained in Notification No. 1305 dated 17.3.2016 was issued, whereby eight charges were framed in Prapatra’Ka’. Thereafter by issuance of another Notification No. 2840 dated 27.6.2016, three more charges were added. After due enquiry, the Enquiry Officer submitted its report on 14.2.2017, whereby charge Nos. 3, 5, 5(i) and 8 were not proved and rest of the charges were found to be proved. After issuance of second show c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.