JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Saurav Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. Present revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 28.02.2012, passed by learned Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur in Cr. Appeal No. 241 of 2009, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

4. The petitioner has been convicted vide judgment dated 02.09.2009, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in G.R. Case No. 2541 of 2001, arising out of Sidgora P.S. Case No. 145 of 2001, corresponding to T.R. No. 372 of 2009, whereby the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 47 (a) of the Excise Act and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo further imprisonment for one month.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the impugned judgments has submitted that informant of the case has not been examined and even the seizure list witnesses has not been examined in the present case. He submits that no indepen