DEEPAK ROSHAN
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Cane Development Department, Government of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. The present writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs:-
(ii) For quashing of the order dated 12.06.2014 as contained in Memo No.256 issued from the office of the respondent No.5 whereby cancelled the appointment of the petitioners and others to the post of Village Level Worker (Jan Sevak).
(iii) For direction upon the respondents to appoint the petitioners on the aforesaid post as the entire process has already been completed and any delay in the appointment was due to latches and negligence of the respondent authorities.
(iv) For direction upon the respondents not to start the fresh process for appointment to the post of Village Level Worker within district Deoghar during the pendency of the present writ application.
3. The brief facts of the case is that a general notification was published by the Department of Agriculture and Sugarcane Development, Government
State of Orissa & Anr. v. Rajkishore Nanda & Ors. reported in (2010) 6 SCC 777
State of Bihar & Ors. v. Amrendra Kumar Mishra reported in (2006) 12 SCC 561
State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Jagdish Chopra reported in (2007) 8 SCC 161
All India SC & ST Employees’ Assn. & Anr. v. A. Arthur Jeen & Ors. reported in (2001) 6 SCC 380
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.