JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that in both the appeals since involving the similar issue, therefore, the same may be heard together and disposed of with this common order. In view thereof, both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided with this common order.

L.P.A.No.371 of 2020

2. The instant intra-court appeal is under Clause-10 of Letters Patent of Patna High Court directed against the order/judgment dated 05.11.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.6725 of 2017, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has refused to interfere with the charge-sheet. 3. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition is required to be enumerated which reads hereunder as:-

The writ petitioner who claims to have been adopted by registered deed as son by late Rameshwar Singh. The said Rameshwar Singh was appointed on the post of Security Guard on 10.11.1973. Late Rameshwar Singh has opted for voluntary retirement in the month of October, 1988 making request for proper employment in favour of the writ petitioner as his adop