JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, the learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 453 of 2014 on I.A. No. 4722 of 2020 as well as on the main criminal revision application.

2. Heard Mr. Yogesh Modi, the learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 561 of 2014.

3. Heard Mr. Suraj Verma, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-State in the both the cases.

4. From perusal of the impugned Judgments, it appears that these two petitioners, who have filed separate criminal revision applications, had filed separate criminal appeals before the learned appellate court against the Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed by the learned trial court. The appeal filed by Smt. Parwati Devi was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2014 and the appeal filed by the other petitioner namely, Gopichand Oraon was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2014. Another appeal was filed by the co-convict namely, Binodanand Mishra which was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2014.

5. All the three separate criminal appeals were disposed of by the court of the learned Additional Judici