APARESH KUMAR SINGH, ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Shroff Enterprises, a partnership Firm – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. M.S. Mittal, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate.
2. Heard Mr. A.K. Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-state and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the JBVNL.
3. These writ petitions have been tagged together as common question of law are involved in all the cases and they relate to different periods.
Writ petition number Period
| Writ petition number | Period |
| W.P. (T) No. 1300 of 2021 | 2014-15 |
| W.P.(T) No. 1303 of 2021 | 2015-16 |
| W.P. (T) No. 1283 of 2021 | 2016-17 |
| W.P. (T) No. 1282 of 2021 | 2017-18 |
4. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the order of assessment dated 22.05.2020 for the respective period passed by the Respondents, whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay electricity duty on the amount of electricity energy consumed by the petitioner and penalty has also been imposed for not getting itself registered under the provisions of Jharkhand Electricity Duty Act and the Rules framed ther
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.