RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Mamta Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter was done through video conferencing and there was no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant appeal is listed under the heading for 'Admission' and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, and the same is being disposed of at this stage itself.
3. This intra-court appeal is preferred against the order/judgment dated 17.10.2019 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 6027 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the writ petition was dismissed declining to interfere with Order No. 707 dated 11.06.2011 passed by respondent no. 3 - District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Officer, Jharkhand Education Project, Sahibganj, by which, the writ petitioner was terminated from services.
4. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be enumerated herein for proper adjudication of the lis, are as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.