JUDGMENT :

S.N. Pathak, J.

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make certain corrections in paras-1(a), 1(d), 16 and 19 as well as in synopsis of the main writ application, as due to typographical mistake some error has been crept-up and for the ends of justice, the same are required to be corrected.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has no objection to the same.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make suitable corrections in the aforesaid paragraphs of the main writ application by red ink, in course of the day.

5. Heard the parties.

6. In the instant writ application prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 29.11.2018, issued by respondent No. 3, whereby a punishment of withholding of three increments with non-cumulative effect has been inflicted against the petitioner and due to the said reason, matter of promotion of the petitioner has also been kept in abeyance.

7. Petitioner has further prayed that after quashing the said order, the respondents may be directed to consider the case of petitioner for grant of promotion from the Basic Grade to Junior Se