SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 908

S.N.PATHAK
Riddhi Rani Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prashant Pallav, Manish Mishra.

JUDGMENT :

S.N. Pathak, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing of the order contained in Memo No. 1808 dated 29th of November, 2019 (Annexure-15) wherein the prayer of the petitioner for determination and disbursement of salary has been denied by the respondent. Further, prayer has been made for quashing the order bearing No. 24/30 dated 07th of January, 2020 (Annexure-16) and letter bearing No. MC/11/2020 dated 8th of February, 2020 (Annexure-17), whereby and wherein, an order has been given to the Competent Authorities that the service of the petitioner be no longer taken and the petitioner has been asked to stop discharging her duties. Further, prayer has been made for a direction upon the respondents to pay the current salary and arrears of salary w.e.f. 22.03.2012 with all consequential benefits to the petitioner, which has not been paid to her since joining.

2. The factual exposition as has been delineated in the writ petition is that on 20.01.2009, an advertisement was issued for appointment of Bengali Trained Permanent Assistant Teacher in daily newspaper in Dinabandhu Middle School, Deoghar. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner, fulfilling all the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top