SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 849

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Uttam Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 3645 of 2021
Decided On : 30-11-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Amritansh Vats, Mr. Kunal Priyam.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sachin Kumar, A.A.G.-II, Mr. Gaurav Raj, A.C. to A.A.G.-II.

Headnote:

Reservation Rules, 2001 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 16 - Advertisement - Appointment To Post - In advertisement, “higher qualification in concerned field” was mentioned as “desirable qualification”- Petitioner being diploma holder in civil engineering was shocked and surprised to see provisional merit list for appointment to post of Junior Engineer (contractual) which was prepared on basis of marks obtained by candidates mentioning their educational qualifications wherein huge number of candidates being direct B.Tech degree holders were shown as selected in spite of fact that as per terms of advertisement, essential qualification was only restricted to Diploma in Civil Engineering or equivalent. Hence, present writ petition – Held, Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner not in form of Public Interest Litigation, rather raising his individual grievance - Since petitioner will not come in merit list in any circumstance, this Court is of view that question of law raised by petitioner remains an academic one - Consequently, question of law is left open to be decided in an appropriate case - Moreover, petitioner has also failed to show malafide on part of respondents, rather it has been found that respondents have adopted uniform procedure for preparation of merit list - In case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra), Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that equivalence of qualification is not a matter which can be determined in exercise of power of judicial review - It is upon State Government to determine as to whether a particular qualification is to be regarded as equivalent to some other qualification - Thus, scope of interference by this Court in such matter is minimal – Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing and setting aside the Advertisement No. 252(ii)/2021-21 so far it relates to appointment on the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) since the applicability of 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) has not been implemented in the said advertisement despite the fact that the Government of India, vide an office memorandum dated 31.01.2019, has introduced 10% reservation for EWS in direct recruitment in civil posts and services of Government of India and pursuant thereto, the State of Jharkhand has also introduced reservation quota of 10% for EWS by amending the Reservation Rules, 2001. The said decision has been published vide notification dated 25.02.2019 superseded by another notification dated 08.07.2019. Further prayer has been made for quashing and setting aside the primary provisional merit list as well as entire examination process for the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) pursuant to the Advertisement No. 252(ii)/2020-21 so far it relates to provisional selection of candidates who are B.Tech degree holders as they are not eligible in terms with the said advertisement.

2. In course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined the prayer to the extent of quashing the provisional merit list prepared for the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) pursuant to the Advertisement No. 252(ii)/2020-21 wherein the B.Tech degree holders have also been made eligible for the said post and included in the provisional merit list.

3. The factual background of the case as stated in the writ petition is that in the light of Resolution No. 395 dated 19.02.2021 issued under the signature of Director-cum-Joint Secretary, Department of Rural Development (Panchayati Raj), Government of Jharkhand by order of the Hon’ble Governor of Jharkhand, the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi (the respondent no. 3) floated Advertisement No. 252(ii)/2020-21 for Ranchi district inviting applications from eligible candidates to the posts of Junior Engineer and Account Clerk-cum-Computer Operator on contractual basis under 15th Finance Commission. As per the said advertisement, the essential qualification for the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) was Diploma in Civil Engineering or equivalent with minimum 60% marks from recognized university/institution, however for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, the minimum marks was fixed as 50%. The petitioner having Diploma in Engineering and being eligible, applied for the said post and participated in the examination process. In the said advertisement, “higher qualification in the concerned field” was mentioned as “desirable qualification”. The petitioner being diploma holder in civil engineering was shocked and surprised to see the provisional merit list for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) which was prepared on the basis of marks obtained by the candidates mentioning their educational qualifications wherein huge number of candidates being direct B.Tech degree holders were shown as selected in spite of the fact that as per the terms of the advertisement, the essential qualification was only restricted to Diploma in Civil Engineering or equivalent. Hence, the present writ petition.

4. Mr. Amritansh Vats, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that it has nowhere been mentioned in the notification dated 19.02.2021 issued by the Department of Rural Development (Panchayati Raj), Government of Jharkhand that the candidates having B. Tech decree will also be eligible for selection to the post of Junior Engineer (contractual). As per Clause-2(Kha)(i) of the said notification, essential qualification for selection to the post of Junior Engineer (contractual) is Diploma in Civil Engineering or equivalent (regular course) with minimum 60% marks from recognized university/institution, however for SC/ST candidates, minimum marks is 50%. Clause-2(Kha)(ii) also speaks of higher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top