JUDGMENT :

S.N. PATHAK, J.

1. In view of outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, case was taken up through Video Conferencing and heard at length on various dates. Concerned lawyers had no objection with regard to the proceeding which was held through Video Conferencing and there is no complaint in respect to audio and video clarity and quality and after hearing at length, the matter was reserved for Judgment and is being disposed of finally.

PRAYER

2. In the instant writ application prayer has been made for issuance of appropriate writs, orders or directions or writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the letter no. 829, dated 28.03.2017, whereby the respondent no. 7 declined claim of the petitioner for his appointment on compassionate ground on the ground of overage. Petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to consider his representation/objection dated 22.05.2018 against the said order of rejection and further to consider his case for appointment on compassionate ground within a specified period.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. Facts of the case lies in a narrow compass. Petitioner’s father namely Budhan Bhuiyan was a permanent employee of the respondent no. 1 and was working