SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. PATHAK, J.
Dr. (Mrs.) Bratoti Moitra – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 1217 of 2018
Decided on : 02-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Advocate
For the Respondent: Dr. A.K. Singh, Mrs. Vandana Singh, Sr. SC-III

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 16 - Professor - Promotion - Petitioner Nos.1 to 7 & 21 were appointed and had joined as Assistant Professor, whereas rest of petitioners were appointed either as Resident or Tutor or Registrar - Petitioner Nos.9 to 20 were granted promotion to post of Assistant Professor - It is specific case of petitioners that as case of petitioners were not considered for promotion, one of petitioner herein moved before this Hon’ble Court by filing a writ petition being W.P.(S), praying inter alia for a direction upon respondents to consider case of petitioner for promotion to post of Associate Professor – Held, In case of Sushil Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Ors., , has held thus:whether subsequent reconsideration being on very same outstanding performance, appellant was entitled to retrospective promotions - Held, no merits and accolades of candidates recommended for promotion vary from year to year on a comparative merit scale - Appellant’s accolades may not have made a fit case to be recommended in year, but same could make a fit case to be considered in a subsequent year - Further, as matter falls in domain of IF and CDPC, it must be left to discretion of said authorities - As a cumulative effect of aforesaid rules, guidelines and judicial pronouncement and taking into consideration fact that petitioners have already been granted promotion as per Assessment Promotion Scheme, and since they had accepted same without any demur, this Court is not inclined to interfere with instant writ petition – Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.

The petitioners have approached this Court for setting aside the order dated 07.03.2017 issued by the Director-cum-Member Secretary Promotion Committee, RIMS, Ranchi to the extent that the said office order grants promotion to the petitioners from the post of Assistant Professor to Associate Professor w.e.f. 01.07.2016 and not from the date on which the petitioners became eligible for promotion to the post of Associate Professor from Assistant Professor in accordance with the Assessment Promotion Scheme, 2014 formulated by RIMS, Ranchi, which was notified through Notification dated 08.09.2014, namely the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences Regulation, 2014. Further, prayer has been made for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion from the post of Assistant Professor to Associate Professor as they are eligible for the same in accordance with the Assessment Promotion Scheme, 2014 formulated by the RIMS, Ranchi through Notification dated 08.09.2014.

2. The case of the petitioners lies in a narrow compass. The petitioner Nos.1 to 7 & 21 were appointed and had joined as Assistant Professor, whereas rest of the petitioners were appointed and had joined either as Resident or Tutor or Registrar on different dates under the respondents. The petitioner Nos.9 to 20 were granted promotion to the post of Assistant Professor vide Letter No. 5744 dated 30.07.2008 issued by the Director, RIMS, Ranchi. The petitioner No.22 was granted promotion to the said post vide Letter dated 05.08.2008 and petitioner Nos.23 and 24 were granted promotion to the said post vide letter dated 23.08.2008 issued by the Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare. It is specific case of the petitioners that as the case of petitioners were not considered for promotion, one of the petitioner herein moved before this Hon’ble Court by filing a writ petition being W.P.(S) No.3640 of 2015, praying inter alia for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Associate Professor with effective from 2010 and thereafter to the post of Professor from the year, 2014 and to give all the benefits incidental and related to the said post with retrospective effect and this Court vide its order dated 16.12.2016 allowed the said writ petition with the following observation:

    “….. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that in terms of Regulation 11 (II)(i) an exercise for promotion of Assistant Professors in the Grade of Associate Professor shall be undertaken and completed on or before 15.03.2017. It was further ordered that mandate under 2014 Regulations, which provides that Assessment Board shall meet each year for considering fitness of all persons who have completed the requisite length of service as on 30th of June of that year shall be followed each year. The Assessment Board shall hold its meeting preferably in the month of July, however, subject to just exceptions and all the members of the Board shall make themselves available for the Board’s meeting.

5. In so far as, promotion to the post of Additional Professor and Professor is concerned, RIMS shall prepare a gradation list within three months and undertake an exercise for promotion in the grade of Additional Professor and Professor within next three months. This arrangement is only for the year, 2017. After 2017, it is expected that 2014 Regulations shall be adhered to religiously. The gradation list, which shall be prepared each year, shall be uploaded on the web-site and all objections shall be disposed of within 30 days. No objection shall be entertained 30 days after the publication of gradation list. Director, RIMS shall ensure facility for on-line submission of objections, besides an opportunity to submit written objections to the Assessment Board.

3. Thereafter, the petitioners were granted promotion from the post of Assistant Professor to Associate Professor w.e.f. 01.07.201




          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top