SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 943

S.N.PATHAK
Sufal Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rohit Roy, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar, GP-II.

ORDER :

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the order dated 15.04.2004, passed by Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Seraikela in Land Ceiling Case No. 12 of 2003-04 in terms of which an application under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land), Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") filed by the respondent No. 5 has been allowed.

    Petitioner has further prayed for quashing the order dated 22.01.2007, passed by learned Deputy Commissioner, Seraikela-Kharsawan in Land Ceiling Appeal No. 3 of 2004-05, in terms of which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 15.04.2004 has been dismissed.

It has also been prayed for quashing the order dated 23.12.2011/ 06.01.2012, passed by learned Member, Board of Revenue in Rev. Case No. 12 of 2007, by which the Revision preferred by the petitioner under Section 32 of the Act against the order dated 22.01.2007 has been dismissed.

3. The facts of the case in short is that by a registered sale deed dated 23.05.2003, the petitioner purchased 17 decimals of land falling under Plot Nos. 140, 141, 142, Khata No. 19, Than No. 52, situ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top