RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Prerna – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter was done through video conferencing and there was no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. Both these appeals arise out of common order dated 14.08.2018 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1248 of 2010 and W.P.(S) No. 1269 of 2010 by invoking the jurisdiction conferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge has quashed and set aside the impugned orders (reverting the writ petitioners) with a direction to the respondents to issue fresh order of appointment on their promotional post, on which they were earlier promoted/decision was taken to promote, whichever is applicable.
3. The brief facts of the case which are required to be enumerated reads as under:-
The writ petitioners were appointed on Class IV posts in Jharkhand State Electricity Board (hereinafter to be referred to as J.S.E.B.)
State of Karnataka v. M.L. Kesari (2010) 9 SCC 247
Dr. G. Sarana v. University of Lucknow (1976) 3 SCC 585
Marripati Nagaraja v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh (2007) 11 SCC 522
State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty
Union of India v. Narendra Singh
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh
Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Kulwinder Pal Singh v. State of Punbaj
Escorts Farms Ltd. v. Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital, U.P.
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati
Vikas Pratap Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (2013) 14 SCC 494
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.