APARESH KUMAR SINGH, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Jindal Forgings – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Department through Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jamshedpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Roshan, J.
The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing of the order as contained in letter dated 31.3.2022 (Annexure-3) passed under Section 148A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) whereby it has been ordered that the case of the assessee is a fit case for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of the entire reassessment proceeding for the Assessment Year 2018-19 including the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 25.3.2022 (Annexure-2) and also notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 31.3.2022 (Annexure-4).
2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner had filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2018-19, on 25.09.2018. The books of the petitioner were duly audited as per Section 44AB of the Act. On 25.3.2022, a notice under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act was issued to the petitioner calling upon the petitioner to show- cause as to why notice under Section 148 of the Act be not issued for the reasons stated in annexure to the notice dated 25.3.2022. In this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.