SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 219

RAJESH SHANKAR
Sarita Kachhap – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Faruque Ansari.
For the Respondent: Amitesh Kumar Geasen.

ORDER :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing order dated 29.10.2021 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Gumla (the respondent no. 3) in Mutation Appeal Case No. 17 of 2019-20 whereby the order dated 18.10.2016 passed by the Circle Officer, Sisai (the respondent no. 4) in Mutation Case No. 101 R 27/2016-17 allowing mutation in favour of the petitioner with respect to the land appertaining to plot nos. 2028, 2401, 2057 and 2053 under Khata No. 190, Mouza-Sisai, P.S. No. 76, District-Gumla measuring an area of 3.57 acres, has been set aside.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of preferring revision under Section 16 of the Bihar (now Jharkhand) Tenant’s Holdings (Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973 (in short “the Act 1973”) against the impugned order dated 29.10.2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 in Mutation Appeal Case No. 17 of 2019-20, I am not inclined to entertain the present writ petition at this stage and the same is dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take alternative recourse of preferring revision unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top