SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 220

RAJESH SHANKAR
Satish Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ajit Kumar.
For the Respondent: C.G.A. Bardhan.

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SHANKAR, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing letter No. 910 dated 16.08.2021, letter No. 1070 dated 20.09.2021, letter No. 982 dated 26.08.2021, letter No. 1026 dated 08.09.2021 and letter No. 1044 dated 14.09.2021 (Annexure-6 series to the writ petition) issued by the respondent No. 4, who on the basis of the inspections made by the officials of the Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA), Ranchi Region, Ranchi behind the back of the petitioners and without serving copy of the same, has directed them to stop unauthorized use of the premises in question, except the purpose for which the same were allotted to them as well as to stop the use of the same for residential purposes, failing which an appropriate action would be taken against them in accordance with law.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the writ petition.

3. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the inspections of the respective industrial plots allotted to them were made by the officials of the JIADA, Ranchi Region, Ranchi behind their back. Moreover, the impugned letters have been issued in the shape of the final direction g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top