RAJESH SHANKAR
Paodhari Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo no.15 dated 7th January, 2022 passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Saraikella-respondent no.2 in SARFAESI Case no.35 of 2021-22, whereby physical possession of the land appertaining to plot no.96, new Khata no.271, old Khata no.50, portion of new plot no.1254 corresponding to old plot no.267 of village Bhatia, P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikella-Kharsawan has been taken irrespective of the fact that the said land over which a house has been constructed is the only residence of the petitioner (mother of the borrower-Manoj Kumar Sharma and widow of Late Ramdip Sharma- guarantor of the loan).
2. Mr. Pratyush Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5, submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has the efficacious/statutory/alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the SARFAESI Act, 2002’).
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the contents of the writ petition, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.