SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 296

RAJESH SHANKAR
Jhari Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Munga Lal Kr. Chitra.
For the Respondents: Manav Poddar, Devesh Krishna, Khushboo Kataruka.

ORDER :

1. Since similar issue is involved in both the writ petitions, the same are being taken up together with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. In W.P. (C) No. 2713 of 2022, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the notices dated 18th February, 2022 and 12th April, 2022 (Annexures-4 and 5 to the writ petition, respectively) issued by the Circle Officer, Ormanjhi, Ranchi- respondent no. 3 in Encroachment Case no. 03 of 2021-22, whereby he has been directed to remove the encroachment, measuring an area of 45’ x 6’ = 0.620 decimal (RCC roof) and 45’ x 7’ = 0.724 decimal (Tina shed), appertaining to Khata No. 50, plot no. 32 of village Dardag, Thana no. 33, P.S. Ormanjhi, District Ranchi.

3. In W.P. (C) No. 2101 of 2022, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the notices dated 18th February, 2022 and 12th April, 2022 (Annexures-6 and 10 to the writ petition, respectively) issued by the Circle Officer, Ormanjhi, Ranchi- respondent no. 3 in Encroachment Case no. 03 of 2021-22, whereby he has been directed to remove the encroachment, measuring an area of 30’ x 34’ = 2.34 decimals, appertaining to Khata no. 15, plot no. 110 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top