APARESH KUMAR SINGH, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Ujjain Steel Processors – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred for following reliefs:
(ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing/setting aside the ex-parte order being Reference No. 201 dated 15.09.2020 under section 73(9) of the JGST Act and DRC-07 dated 18.09.2020 (Annexure-10 and 11) respectively.
(iii) For unblocking credit ledger which was blocked on 14.02.2020 to the tune of Rs. 5,18,731/- even before serving the show cause notice under the JGST Act.
3. The brief facts of the case as disclosed in the writ application is that the Petitioner is a Partnership Firm, engaged in trading of iron and steel and is duly registered under the provision of GST Act being registration no. 20AAEFU1474E1ZM. The petitioner for the furtherance of his business activity, purchase steel from many other business entity; one of such is M/s Maa Kali Steel, Purlia Roa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.