SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 444

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Ujjain Steel Processors – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amrita Sinha.
For the Respondent: Sachin Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred for following reliefs:

    (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing/setting aside the show cause notice issued under Reference No. 98 dated 30.07.2020 (Annexure-5,) under section 73(1) and Rule 142(1) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Taxes, (JGST) Act.

(ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing/setting aside the ex-parte order being Reference No. 201 dated 15.09.2020 under section 73(9) of the JGST Act and DRC-07 dated 18.09.2020 (Annexure-10 and 11) respectively.

(iii) For unblocking credit ledger which was blocked on 14.02.2020 to the tune of Rs. 5,18,731/- even before serving the show cause notice under the JGST Act.

3. The brief facts of the case as disclosed in the writ application is that the Petitioner is a Partnership Firm, engaged in trading of iron and steel and is duly registered under the provision of GST Act being registration no. 20AAEFU1474E1ZM. The petitioner for the furtherance of his business activity, purchase steel from many other business entity; one of such is M/s Maa Kali Steel, Purlia Roa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top