SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 550

RAJESH SHANKAR
Sadhu Singh Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. H.K. Mahato, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Mithilesh Singh, G.A.IV

JUDGMENT :

1. At the request of the counsel for the petitioner, “The Additional Director-cum-Chairman, Visthapan Nirgaman Samiti, Subernarekha Multipurpose Project, Bikas Bhavan, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S.- Adityapur, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan” is permitted to be impleaded as respondent no. 7 in the present writ petition.

2. Necessary insertion in the cause title of the writ petition be made by the counsel for the petitioner in course of the day.

3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing memo no. 06 dated 06.01.2016 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 2-Rehabilitation Officer No.-2, Subernarekha Multipurpose Project, Chandil whereby the petitioner’s claim for issuance of ‘Separate Vikas Pustika’ in his favour has been rejected on the ground that as per master-card no.10069 issued to his father- Kalipad Singh Munda in the year 2006 (28.08.2006), the petitioner’s age was mentioned as 22 years and as such he was not major on 06.10.1987 i.e. the date of issuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, “the Act, 1894”) with respect to Chano village.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top