SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1169

NAVNEET KUMAR
Dinesh Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mrs. J.K. Mazumdar, Ms. Anushka Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.03.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Rajmahal, Sahibganj in Sessions Case No. 152 of 2000, Sessions Trial No. 70 of 2002 in connection with Kotal Pokhar P.S. Barharwa P.S. Case No. 86 of 1999, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 415 of 1999, Sahibganj, Jharkhand, whereby and where under the learned trial court convicted the accused appellants for the offence punishable u/s 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and further they were given benefit of section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

2. Heard Mrs. J.K. Mazumdar, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Anushka Sharma, learned counsel for appellants and Mrs. Vandana Bharati, learned A.P.P. for the State.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has submitted that this appeal is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of admonition dated 30.03.2005 whereby and where under the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable u/s 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and further they were given benefit of section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and accordingly, they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top