SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 382

SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, ANANDA SEN
Krishna Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Akash Deep.
For the Respondents: Jai Prakash, Yogesh Modi, Aanya.

JUDGMENT :

1. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner prays mainly for the following relief:

    “(a) For challenging the vires of Clause 18¼1½¼ ढ½ ^^vxj mlds nks ls vf/kd thfor larku gS] ijUrq ;g fd bl vf/kfu;e ds Áo`r gksus ds ,d o"kZ dh vof/k rd ;k fQj vxj fdlh O;fDr dks nks ls vf/kd larku gSa rks og v;ksX; ugha gksxk** 14.11.2022 issued under the signature of State Election Commission, by which certain condition has been imposed for contesting the local municipal election of Municipality of the year 2022-23, which is ultra vires in nature.”

2. The issue involved in this writ application is no more res integra. The Hon’ble Supreme Court was in seisin of similar provision in Javed and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others, (2003) 8 SCC 369, wherein, the vires of Section 175(1)(q) and 177(1) of Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (11 of 1994) was challenged, where a disqualification was prescribed to a person who had more than two living children after one year of cut-off date. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has already held that such provision is not ultra vires to the Constitution. At paragraph 64 and 65, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while considering the matter has held as follows:

    “64. Hyp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top