Back
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Manish Ranjan, son of Makeshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Sweta Rani, daughter of Rajni Kant Prasad – Respondent
ORDER :
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
I.A. No.10797 of 2022 in First Appeal No. 117 of 2019
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the appellant has brought to our attention the communication dated 19th October 2016 addressed to Smt. Sweta Rani.
2. Through this communication, the Assistant General Manager of the State Bank of Hyderabad has informed her that gross salary of Manish Ranjan for the month of September, 2016 was Rs.92,930.76/-.
3. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the appellant states that by filing an interlocutory application the appellant intends to bring this document on record to support her claim for enhancement in the quantum of permanent alimony.
4. As would appear from discussions in Original Suit No. 27 of 2017 (in short, the divorce case), the family Court has taken note of income of the respondent in the year 2018 which was about Rs.1-1.25/- lacs.
5. The observations made by the family Court in paragraph no.7 of the divorce case have not been challenged by the appellant in the present proceeding.
6. In view of the aforesaid, we do not feel it necessary to take the aforesaid communication dated 19th October 2016 on record and, accordingly, the interl
The court held that the existence of sufficient grounds for divorce must be demonstrated, alongside appropriate permanent alimony reflecting the spouse's standard of living prior to separation.
A marriage may be dissolved when irretrievable breakdown is evident, especially where cruelty is established, and financial obligations for maintenance must be assessed equitably.
The court upheld the enhancement of alimony from Rs. 5,000/- to Rs. 18,000/- based on the appellant's increased earnings and the need for maintenance to reflect the parties' standard of living.
The wide scope of section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 enables the court to award maintenance at the time of passing any decree, ensuring financial support for a dependent spouse.
Family Courts are passing orders under Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act while finally deciding matrimonial disputes more or less in mechanical manner without making proper inquiry - This does not ser....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
