APARESH KUMAR SINGH, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Om Prakash Kashyap, a Proprietorship Firm, through its Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred for following reliefs:-
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration, declaring that the order dated 15.05.2020 passed by Respondent No.2 (Annexure-11), wherein Declaration filed by the petitioner under Section 125 (2) of SABKA VISHWAS (LEGACY DISPUTE RESOLUTION) SCHEME, 2019, in Form SVLDRS-1, has been rejected, is wholly beyond jurisdiction and beyond the powers vested upon the Designated Committee in terms of Section 126 of SABKA VISHWAS (LEGACY DISPUTE RESOLUTION) SCHEME, 2019, (herein after referred to as “Scheme of 2019”.
(iii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to accept the Declaration filed by the petitioner under Section 125(2) of the Sche
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.