SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, AMBUJ NATH, JJ.
Aasif Ansari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondents
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 338 of 2014 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 309 of 2014 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 310 of 2014 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 313 of 2014
Decided on : 13-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate:M/s Supriya Dayal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Special P.P.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases involving serious offenses such as murder.

Headnote:

Murder - Indian Penal Code - Section 302/120B, Section 379 - The judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the lower court are set aside due to the prosecution's failure to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves the murder of Gulab Nabi Ansari, who was allegedly killed by his in-laws and others. The prosecution's case was based on the testimony of eyewitnesses and the written report of the deceased's father.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution's evidence, including the testimony of eyewitnesses, was inconsistent and unreliable. The court also noted that the informant's claim of being informed by the eyewitnesses was not supported by the evidence.

Issues: The key issue was the reliability of the eyewitness testimony and the informant's claim of being informed by the eyewitnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and lack of corroboration in the evidence.

Final Decision: The judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the lower court were set aside, and the appeals were allowed. The appellant in custody was directed to be released immediately, and the other appellants were discharged from their bail bonds.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned Special P.P.

2. Since all these appeals are directed against a common judgment, hence they are being disposed of by this common order. So far as the appellant no. 2 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.313 of 2014 is concerned, he has died during the pendency of the appeal and therefore the appeal preferred by him has abated.

3. These appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 25.02.2014 and order of sentence dated 1.3.2014, passed by Shri Ram Babu Gupta, learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Garhwa in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2012/S.T. Case No. 135 of 2012, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 302/120B and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.5,000/-each for the offence punishable under sections 302/120B IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months as also to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-each for the offence punishable under section 379 IPC and in default in payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently.

4. A written report was submitted by Nurul Hoda Ansari on 20.7.2011, in which it has been stated that the marriage of his son Gulab Nabi Ansari was solemnized with Reshma Khatoon, daughter of Mohiuddin Ansari. Mohiuddin Ansari lives with his family in Garhwa Dakbunglow. Reshma Khatoon was also staying with her father. It has been stated that on 16.7.2011, Reshma Khatoon had called Gulab Nabi Ansari to Garhwa Dakbunglow but due to rains Gulab Nabi Ansari could not visit the said place. On 19.7.2011, Reshma Khatoon had once again called the son of the informant to her parents’ place and on repeated insistence of Reshma Khatoon, the son of the informant along with his brother Kausar Ansari went to Garhwa Dakbunglow. Kausar Ansari after leaving Gulab Nabi Ansari at Garhwa Dakbunglow came back to his house in the evening and disclosed that Gulab Nabi on the advice of his brother in law Aasif Ansari, his wife and his parents in law had left on a vehicle to Sidhe, the reason being to purchase some articles needed for the Bidai of the bride. It has been alleged that when in the morning, the informant went in search of his son to Garhwa Dakbunglow, Mohiuddin Ansari stated that his son is missing since night. Later on, the informant came to know that a dead body is lying in Sidhe and when he went he recognized the dead body as that of his son Gulab Nabi Ansari. He suspected that Reshma Khatoon, her parents, Aasif Ansari and Sharafat Ansari had committed the murder of his son.

5. Based on the aforesaid allegations, Garhwa P.S. Case No. 256 of 2011 was instituted for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 IPC against Reshma Khatoon, Mohiuddin Ansari, the wife of Mohiuddin Ansari, Aasif Ansari and Sharafat Ansari. On completion of investigation, chargesheets were submitted against the named accused persons and after cognizance was taken, the cases were committed to the court of sessions where they were registered separately as S.T. No. 53/2012 and S.T. No. 135/2012. On their amalgamation vide order dated 19.03.2012, charge was framed against the accused persons for the offences punishable under sections 302/120B and 379 IPC, which was read over and explained to the accused to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6. The prosecution has examined as many as eleven witnesses in support of its case. P.W-1-Khushdil Ansari has stated that the incident had taken place nine months back. He had gone to his inlaws place along with his wife Jaibun Bibi and at night, his brother Nurul Hoda had called up his brother in law and informed him that Gulam has gone to his inlaws place at Garhwa to bring some provisions along with his brothe

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top