Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Central Coalfields Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on coal royalty payment obligations (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. overview of certificate proceeding initiation (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments on certificate officer's obligations (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. counterarguments regarding alternative remedy (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's analysis on maintainability of writ petition (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. court's reasoning on statutory compliance by certificate officer (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. failure to consider objections amounts to a violation (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. active mind application necessary in decision making (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. court's final ruling to quash certificate officer's order (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
Prayer
1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 30.09.2013/30.10.2013 passed by Certificate Officer (Mining), Bokaro in Certificate Case No.04/12-13 by which the objection filed under Section 9 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 has been rejected without taking into consideration the documents having bearing on the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
