Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Jitesh Kumar S/o Late Nawal Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the General Manager, South Eastern Railway – Respondent
ORDER :
I.A. 7989 of 2025
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for deletion of the name of petitioner no.10 namely, Yogendra Prasad from the cause title.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Considering the ground taken in the instant interlocutory application, this Court is of the view that the prayer for deleting the name of the petitioner no.10 namely, Yogendra Prasad from the cause title, requires to be allowed.
4. Accordingly, the prayer made in the instant interlocutory application, is allowed.
5. The name of the petitioner no.10 namely, Yogendra Prasad from the cause title is hereby deleted from the array of the petitioners.
6. In view thereof, I.A. No.7989 of 2025 stands allowed.
7. Office is directed to carry out necessary deletion in the array of petitioners.
Prayer:
8. The instant writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against order dated 08.04.2025 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna in O.A. Nos. 750/19 and analogous cases, for the following reliefs: -
(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s) /Order(s) / direction(s) or writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing and setti
Public employment recruitment must adhere to fairness and transparency principles; systemic irregularities justify cancellation of selection processes. No vested rights exist without appointment lett....
(1) Appointment – Normally, it is not for courts to interfere unless process smacks of mala fides – However, right to be considered for public employment being a Fundamental Right, it would be safe a....
In cases of widespread irregularities in selection processes, cancellation of entire selection is justified, as separation of affected candidates is not feasible.
Procedural fairness mandates documented justifications for cancellation of selections post-qualification, upholding legitimate expectations of candidates.
Provisional appointment cancellations must follow due disciplinary processes; removal without inquiry violates natural justice principles.
Authorities must provide cogent justification and adhere to procedural fairness in promotion cancellations, as required by natural justice principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
