SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Mad) 150

VARADARAJAN
Eni Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Soosai Michael Mudaliar – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Ratnam, for Appellant.
C.K. Logadoss, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT.-The plaintiff, who succeeded in the trial Court but lost before the lower appellate Court, is the appellant. She filed the suit for redemption of an othi under Exhibit A-l dated 6th May, 1955 executed by her husband Mayakrishna Konar in favour of one Mayilerumperumal. Mayakrishna executed a settlement deed dated 21st April, 1964 in favour of the appellant and subsequently cancelled it and deserted her. Thereafter he executed an othi deed, Exhibit A-l, dated 6th May, 1955 in favour of Mayilerumperumal. The appellant filed O.S.No. 168 of 1955 in the District Munsif’s Court, Ambasamudram, against her husband Mayakrishna for partition and separate possession of a half share and also for her maintenance on a charge of certain properties, including the present suit properties, impleading the mortgagee Mayilerumperumal as the second defendant in the suit. She obtained a preliminary decree for partition and maintenance at Rs. 15 per mensem on a charge of the suit properties subject to the suit under Exhibit A-l on 9th July, 1956 and she obtained the final decree, Exhibit A-7, on 5th August, 1957. Subsequently she filed E.P. No. 430 of 1966 and brought the suit properties to sale










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top