SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Mad) 544

A.VARADARAJAN
K. Daniel Nadar and others – Appellant
Versus
R. Ananthan Pillai and others – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Padmanabhan, for Appellants.

JUDGMENT.-The legal representatives of the plaintiff K. Daniel Nadar, who failed in both the Court below are the appellants. Daniel Nadar filed the suit for partition and separate possession of 2 acres of land out of the suit propetty which is 13. 12 acres S. No 3020-A of Ponmanai village, Kalkulam taluk. The allegation the plaint was that one half of Survey N . 3020-A, the total extent where of is 26 acres and 30 cents belonged to one Dr. John Hilkiah, who bad been impleaded as the second plaintiff and legal representative of the first plaintiffin O.S. No. 293 of 1120 H.F. which was filed by the deceased first plaintiff Nakshatram Abaranam of C lacbal Paguthifor partition of a half share, impleading the plaintiff Daniel Nadar as the 10th defendant. The other half share belonged according to the first plaintiff Nakshatram Abaranam to defendants 1 and 2 - Anan than Pillai and Velayudhan Pillai respoctively and their maternal uncle Raman Pillai and they became divided as per Fxhibit A-1 dated 13th November,1097 M.F. Subsequently Raman Pillais 1 2 acres in S. N . 3020-A to the plaintiff - Daniel Nagar under Fxhibit A-2 dated the 5-11-1117 M.F. 16th June, 1947. Defendants 3 to 14 are e





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top