P.S.KAILASAM, V.BALASUBRAHMANYAN
Panduranga Chetti and another – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Collector of N. Arcot and another – Respondent
2. The enquiry before the Settlement Tahsildar was suo motu as no one applied for patta for lands. The Karnam (C.W. 1), stated that survey No. 132 would be liable for submersion for over a month. He did not mention anything about survey No. 133/5. But, according to the technical opinion report of the Minor Irrigation Overseer, Exhibit C-l, survey Nos. 132 and 133/5, which was provisionally sub-divided, were li
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.