T.RAMAPRASADA RAO, RATNAVEL PANDIAN
M. S. Dharma Raja and others – Appellant
Versus
M. K. Rama Ammal and another – Respondent
2. The suit was filed by the respondentsPlaintiffs for partition and separate possession of an 1/6 share in the plaint A and B schedule properties in favour of the second plaintiff on in the alternative for directing framing of a scheme for the effective management of the plaint-A schedule properties, making due provision for the participation of the second plaintiff therein and for his receiving an 1/6 share in the surplus income and also directing the division of the plaint B Schedule properties and delivering an 1/6 share therein to the second plaintiff: (2) for directing the defendants to render a true and proper account for the income derived by them from 13th June, 1967 from the plaint A schedule properties and also as regards the sale proceeds of the third item in the schedule attached to the trust settlement deed, dated 13th July, 1931 (Exhibit B-1) and for due payment of the plaintiff’s 1/6 share therein to the second plaintiff, and (3) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from lea
M. Kesava Gounder v. D. C. Rajan 89 L.W. 205; A.I.R. 1976 Mad. 102 : [1976] 1 M.L.J. 56
Nrmala Bala Chose v. Balachand Ghose [1966] 2 S.C.J. 426; [1965] 3 S.C.R. 550; A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 1874
S. Shanmugham Pillai v. K. Shanmugham Pillai [1973] 2 S.C.C. 312;A.I.R.l972 S.C. 2069
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.