1978 Supreme(Mad) 75
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Suryamurthy, J.
K. Pappathiammal .....Appellant(s)
Versus
S. S. Narasimhan .....Respondent(s)
C.R.P. No. 2384 of 1975,
Decided On : 31 January 1978
V. Nicholas, for Petitioner.
Order of dismissal of petition filed by decree holder not justified.
Headnote:Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 21-Petition by decree-holder for sale of property attached in execution-Unconditional permission to bid at the auction and set off given-Decree holder filing petition for reduction of upset price-Order of dismissal of petition and raising of attachment held not justified.
2. The decree-holder is entitled to apply for a reduction of, the upset price. The valuation in the sale proclamation is intended to protect the judgment-debtor and to give information to the bidders in the auction-sale. It is not an exact estimate of the value of the property. Therefore, if there is no bid at the upset price fixed, it may be reduced in the interest of justice, if the executing Court is satisfied that the price fixed is too high. Therefore the order in R.E.A. No. 187 of 1975 is set aside and R.E.A. No. 187 of 1975 is remanded to the learned District Munsif of Krishnagiri for being dealt with according to law. The, civil revision petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. There will be no order as to costs.