P.S.KAILASAM, V.BALASUBRAHMANYAN
Padmavathi and Bheema Raja – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Education Department, Madras-9 and The Special Tahsildar for Land Acquisition, Town Planning, Coimbatore – Respondent
“(1) Besides publishing the notice as prescribed in rule 1 of the Appendix I, the Collector should see that individual notices are served as far as possible on every person known or believed to be interested in the
Union of India v. Joseph [1973] 2 S.C.R. 752; [1974] 2 S.C.J. 276; A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 303
State of Mysore v. V. K. Kangan [1976] 2 S.C.C. 895; [1976] 1 S.C.R. 369; A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 2190
Ghousia Begum v. Union Territory
Easwara Pillai v. State of Tamil Nadu 85 L.W. 894 : [1972] 1 M.L.J. 92
A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India [1970] 1 S.C.J. 381; [1970] 1 S.C.R. 457; A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 150
State of Gujarat v. Ambalal [1976] 3 S.C.C. 495; A.I.R. 1976 S.C. 2002
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.