P.S.KAILASAM, V.BALASUBRAHMANYAN
Hajee Abdullah Sait – Appellant
Versus
Mohandas and others – Respondent
The decree-holder has now preferred this civil miscellaneous appeal.
2. The only question that arises for consideration in the appeal is whether the respondents are tenants entitled to the benefits of section 10 of Tamil Nadu Act XVIII of 1960. It is necessary to set out the relevant facts in this dispute between landlord and tenant which commenced in 1961 and has lasted for over fifteen years. On 20th February, 1954 a lease deed was executed between the appellant’s father (landlord) and K.D. Moorjani (tenant). On 4th April, 1961 the landlord terminated the tenancy and on 4th O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.