T.RAMAPRASADA RAO
Vellaiki Konar – Appellant
Versus
Kamala Devi, through her Power-of-Attorney Agent Subramania Pillai – Respondent
2. Before the facts which touch upon this civil revision petition are set out, it is convenient to refer, in brief, to the events which happened prior to it. On 21st July, 1971, the landowner (respondent herein) filed an application T.C.T.P. No. 38 of 1971 under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection. Act for recovery of possession of the demised land on the ground that the tenant (petitioner herein) was in arrears of rent. An ex parte order was passed on 17th January, 1972. The petitioner tenant attempted to set aside the ex parte order. He was not successful. He filed a second application to set aside the same. Equally he could not succeed. Thereafter he preferred C.R.P. No. 2191 of 1972 in this Court against the order redusing to set aside the ex parte order. When it came up, a conditional order of stay was passed by this Court. The tenant did not comply with the condition imposed for the grant of stay Ultimately on 19th April, 1975, C.R.P. No. 2191 of 1972 was dismissed. It appears that the landowner took possession of the property pursuant to the order of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.