S.NATARAJAN
Soundharathammal – Appellant
Versus
The Tiruchirapalli Mavattam Mahasuruli Alaya Bakthargal Madya Sangam by its President Balarmuthu Servai, Vice-President Mahayogi Thangam Pillai and Secretary Shanmuga Navalangiar. – Respondent
2. The case of the respondent Sangham, who is the plaintiff, was that one Suruli Andavar Swamigal, who was known in his purvasramam as Palaniandia Pillai was a noble and eminent saint and had a lot of devotees and worshippers before he attained samadhi. Suruli Andavar Swamigal was a bachelor and after he attained mukthi, his followers and worshippers built a samadhi for him at Vadugapatti in Kulathur taluk about thirty-five years ago. A lingam was installed over the samadhi. On one side of the samadhi a Vinayakar temple has been built and on the other side the sacred Vel of Lord Subramania has been installed. Ever since the construction of the samadhi, the Gurupuja for Sri Suruli Andavar was being performed on a grand scale by a large section of the public who constituted bis devotees and worshippers. It was th
Kunhamuthi v. Ahmad Musaliar I.L.R 58 Mad. 204; A.I.R. 1935 Mad. 29 : 68 M.L.J. 107
Ramanasramam v. Commission er H. R. & G. E.
Chennammal v. Commissioner, H. R. & C. E.
Thanumalaya Perumal Mudaliar v. Commissioner, H. R. & C. E.
B. M. Committee v. H. R. E. Board A.I.R. 1954 Mad. 1027 : [1955] 1 M.L.J. 60
Ratnavelu v. Commr. H. R. & C. E. I.L.R. [1955] Mad. 241; A.I.R. 1954 Mad. 398 : [1953] 2 M.L.J. 574
State of Bihar v. Biseshwar Das [1971] 3 S.C.R. 680; A.I.R. 1971 S.C. 2057
Arisomma v. Kunkali 69 L.W. 1023; A.L.R. 1957 Mad. 674 : [1957] 1 M.L.J. 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.