Ramaprasada Rao, J. — The appellants in both the appeals are the plaintiffs respectively in O.S. Nos. 139 of 1966 and 3527 of 1963 on the file of the Court of the City Civil Judge, Madras. The plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their attempt to recover damages with interest as against Thandava Co-operative Agricultural and Industrial Society Limited, Tuni in Andhra Pradesh which is a Society which was manufacturing and distributing sugar to its customers. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 139 of 1966 claims that he entered into a contract with the defendant through Messrs. Aries Sugar Agencies Limited, Madras, for the purchase of ‘Tuni’ Sugar, four waggons (880 bags) from the 1962-63 crops of sugar manufactured by the defendant at Rs.106 per bag, f.o.r. Tuni. The contract was so entered into on or about 7th January, 1963 under Exhibit A-3. A sum Of Rs. 4,400 was paid as earnest money by the plaintiff-appellant through Messrs. Aries Sugar Agencies Limited. According to the plaintiff, he was ready and willing to perform the contract by paying and taking delivery of the goods, that he was calling upon the defendant through Messrs. Aries Sugar Agencies Limited to perform the contract, that the defendant failed to deliver the goods and that in accordance with the main term of the contract, the defendant did not apply for or obtain an allotment to the waggons from the railway for the purpose of despatching the goods to the plaintiff. The plaintiff having waited for a reasonable time and as in any event such goods were not supplied before the first week of April, 1963, issued the suit notice Exhibit A-5 and the reply Exhibit A-6 given by the defendant not being satisfactory, has come to Court claiming damages for non-delivery of the said 880 bags at the rate of Rs. 19 per bag being the difference between the market rate and the contract rate which was reckoned on the basis of the prevailing market rate between the second week of March and first week of April, 1963.

2. Similarly, the plaintiff in O.S. No. 3527 of 1963 entered into a contract with the defendant through Messrs. Aries Sugar Agencies Limited, under the contract marked as Exhibit A-1 for the purchase of 660 bags of sugar of the 1962-63 crop at Rs. 108 per bag f.o.r. Tuni. The clause regarding despatch, which we shall consider in detail in the course of our judgment, provides that the goods have to be despatched to Royapuram as and when waggons were allotted to the defendant by the Railways. The plaintiff in this action also paid the necessary advance through Messrs. Aries Sugar Agencies Limited and was awaiting supply till the first week of April, 1963. The defendant failed to supply the goods and did not deliver the goods as per the contract. The plaintiff accuses the defendant as not having taken diligent steps in the matter of the application and allotment of waggons by the Railways and that the defendant failed to deliver the goods within a reasonable time and in any event such supplies ought to have been made by the first week of April, 1963. Consequent upon the defendant’s failure to do so and after issuing the suit notice and after having obtained a reply on the same lines of the reply notice given in the other suit, the plaintiff has come to Court claiming a sum of Rs. 11,220 as damages for non-performance of the contract, though the plaintiff was ready and willing to do his part under it, on the basis of Rs. 17 per bag being the difference between the contract rate and the market rate.

3. The defendant raised practically a common defence which we shall summarise in so far as it is relevant for our purposes. According to the defendant, the City Civil Court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit and the defendant denied that it committed any breach of contract. It referred to the Sugar Control Order of 1955 and stated that there were enough Governmental restrictions in the matter of the release and supply of goods for domestic consumption and that such inevitable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document