SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 507

R.PAUL
Murthi Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Karuppanna Gounder – Respondent


Advocates:
V.V. Sridharan, for Petitioner.
A.S. Venkatachalamurthy, for Respondent.

ORDER: This revision petition is against the order of the learned District Munsif of Sankari refusing to allow an application filed by the revision petitioner-first defendant under Order 8, rule 9 and section 151, Civil Procedure Code, to receive the additional written statement.

2. The suit filed by the respondent was for declaration of his title to the suit property which comprises of wet lands and for a permanent injunction restrain-ing the defendants from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the same.

3. The suit was resisted by the defendants, of whom the fifth defendant filed a written statement which was adopted by defendants 1 to 4. In that written statement, it is categorically admitted in paragraph 3 that the suit property belongs to the plaintiff and Muthu-swamy and they are in enjoyment of the same. But later, on, it is stated that about seven months prior to the filing of that written statement, the entire villagers of Thanamuthiyar Village in Kurumbapaty Panchayat headed by a particular M.L.A. convened a meeting at the request of the villagers and decided to put up a pucca road from Idappadi-Konganapuram Main Road passing through several patta lands includin











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top