SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 605

S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN


Advocates:
E.H.B. David, for Petitioner.
The Public Prosecutor, No. II, for State.

Order. - Accused 1 to 6 in C.C.No. 3721 of 1974 on the file of the Ninth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras, are the revision-petitioners.

2. They stood charged by the Inspector of Police, Food Cell, C.I.D. Investigation Wing V Madras, for an offence under clause 17 of the Tamil Nadu Kerosene (Regulation of Trade) Order, 1973, read with section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and sections 3 and 23 (1) of the Petroleum Act, 1934, on the allegation that on 16th July, 1973 at about 4-30 p.m., at No. 188, Rathinasabhapathi Street, Puliyurpuram, Kodambakkam, the accused were in possession of 3,500 litres of kerosone, 170 litres of diesel and 800 litres of dangerous petrol valued at Rs. 4,000 contained in barrels and tins for sale and that the said quantity of petroleum products, empty barrels, measuring vessels funnels and connected records, were seized from the possession of the accused and that the accused were not having any valid licence for the possession of the said petroleum products.

3. When examined, the accused admitted the above said offence and pleaded guilty to the charge. Accordingly, the lower Court found them guilty of the above said offence and sentenced a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top