VARADARAJAN
K. Ramachandra Rao – Appellant
Versus
Krishnaswami Iyengar and others – Respondent
2. The respondent filed the eviction petition R.C.O.P.No.137 of 1969 before the Rent Controller, Kumbakonam under section 14 (1) (6) alleging that the building is in very bad state of repairs and requires to be immediately pulled down and re-constructed and that he therefore requires the building for the purpose of demolition and re-construction. The learned Rent Controller did not give any specific finding regarding the condition of the building but allowed the petition observing that there is nothing uncommon in the petitioner before him requiring the building for demolition and reconstruction and that under these circumstances he has no reason to doubt the honesty and bona fides of the petitioner before him. But on appeal, the Appellate Authority (Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonam) in C.M.A.No.49 of 1971 came
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.