S.MAHARAJAN
Goodman and Company, by its Proprietor R. C. Mallikeswaran, having its Office No. 31, Jawaharlal Nehru Street, Pondicherry – Appellant
Versus
R. S. Thirunavukarasu – Respondent
2. The suit itself was filed for recovery of possession of a radio set from the defendant, or in the alternative, for recovery of Rs. 450 being the value thereof. The case of the plaintiff was that in the month of July, 1965, the defendant came to the plaintiff’s company for the purchase of a radio set. The plaintiff was willing to sell the plaint schedule radio set to the defendant, but the defendant said he would observe the functioning of the radio set for 2 or 3 days and if he was satisfied with the quality of the set, he would pay for the same. But the defendant neither paid the money nor returned the radio set. The suit itself was filed on 23rd February, 1971. The defendant denied the plaint allegation and said that the radio had been gifted to him in 1965 for the services rendered by him to the plaintiff’s company.He also contended that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by limitation.
3. The Court below, relying
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.