Order. - The landlord, who lost before the Rent Control Appellate Authority, in the matter of eviction of the tenant respondent in an application filed under section 10 (3) (c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 on the ground that he needed additional accommodation, has come up; to this Court. The landlord’s case is that the respondent is a tenant under the petitioner occupying two shops in the ground floor of premises No. 75, Harris Road, Madras-2, and is carrying on a nonresidential activity. The landlord is residing in the same premises with his family and the members of his family are running an English Medium School known as Saraswathi Nursery School in the same-premises and the accommodation for running the said school is not sufficient for them and, therefore, he requires the two shops in the occupation of the tenant for the benefit of his family members. The petitioner would say that the respondent has constructed a two storeyed building in the same road and it would not be inconvenient for him to shift his spare parts shops to his new premises. As the tenant respondent failed to vacate in spite of notice, and as the accommodation provided to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document