P.S.KAILASAM, G.RAMANUJAM, V.BALASUBRAHMANYAN
The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras . – Appellant
Versus
Dr. K. Manjunatha Rai – Respondent
2. The statement of the case shows that before stamping the instrument the respondent took it to the Collector of Madras and sought his opinion as to the proper stamp duty payable thereon. The Collector went into the matter and, by his order, dated 21st April, 1970, considered the document to be a release deed and determined the stamp duty payable at Rs. 22.50. On getting the Collector’s opinion the respondent stamped the instrument as a release deed with Rs. 22.50, and presented the document for registration before the sub-Registrar of Assurances, Madras-1. The Sub-Registrar however, impounded the document as insufficiently stamped in the view that it was a conveyance, and not a release as determined by the Collector. On further reference, the Distr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.