S.K.KADER
Chammanattil Balakrishnan and others – Appellant
Versus
O. P. Muhammed and others – Respondent
2. The case of the A-party is that this property was taken on an oral lease by him from his father Alavikutty Haji in the year 1960 fixing an annual rent of 7 paras of paddy and thereafter he has been in actual possession and enjoyment of the same. This land is used by him for raising seedlings for the purpose of cultivation in his other paddy-lands having an extent of about 5 acres. He has been paying rent and obtaining receipts for the same from the lessor. Similarly,, he has been paying land revenue for this land which is included in Patta No. 291. The assignment deed relied on by the B-party is a sham document not supported by consideration and no possesion passed under the said document to the B-party. This document was got executed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.