T.RAMAPRASADA RAO, S.NATARAJAN
Kandaswami Chettiar and others – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Chettiar and others – Respondent
2. The plaintiff’s case is as follows: One Devaraja Chettiar had four sons, the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3. He is said to have carried on a business in coconuts and plantains in Tiruvallur town, with the income from the family properties. The plaintiff has set out in schedule B to the plaint all such joint family properties in which the appellants and respondents 1 to 3 as members of the same, are entitled to a share. It is not disputed that Devaraja Chettiar, by himself inherited certain properties, which became joint family properties, of the plaintiff and respondents 1 to 3 after the demise of Devaraja Chettiar. It is also said that certain properties were bequeathed to plaintiff and respondents 1 to 3 under a Will Exhibit A-1 dated 12th August, 1940, whereby one Masi Ammal, paternal grandmother of the plaintiff bequeathed certain properties of hers to the sons of Devaraja Chettiar. The
Ramudu Mudaliar v. Ellammal A.I.R. 1974 Mad. 51 : [1973] 1 M.L.J. 388
Mallesappa v. Mallappa [1962] 2 S.C.J. 589; [1961] 3 S.C.R. 779; A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1268;
Nagayasami v. Kochadai A.I.R. 1969 Mad. 329 : [1970] 1 M.L.J. 105
Girimallappa v. Yeliappagonda A.I.R. 1959 S.C. 906
Narayanaswami v. Ramakrishna A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 289; [1965] 1 S.C.J. 522; [1964] 7 S.C.R. 490
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.